Plastic Challenge 2017
July 19, 2017 – 11:17 am | 4 Comments

What is the challenge?
June 2017 was officially the Marine Conservation Society’s  ‘Plastic Challenge’ month.
This is the third year of the challenge, which encourages people to pledge to cut down the amount of single-use plastics they …

Read the full story »

The Suma range of food and household products. Our products are sourced ethically, with the environment in mind.


Delicious vegetarian recipes created in our very own Suma canteen. Healthy meals, and a healthy amount of cakes too.


Environmental issues, sustainable business practices, climate change, recycling, green living and more.


New developments and activities at Suma, press releases, and updates we think you’ll be interested in.


Suma is the uk’s largest workers’ cooperative. We operate equal pay and are democratically run by our members.

Home » Ethics

FSA study on organic food

Submitted by on November 18, 2009 – 1:58 pmNo Comment


A recent independent study funded by the Food Standards Agency concluded that organic food is no healthier and provides no significant nutritional benefit compared with conventionally produced food.  The study looked at evidence published over the past 50 years of the different nutrient levels found in crops and livestock from organic and so-called conventional farming regimes and of the health benefits derived from eating organic food.

Dr Alan Dangour, who led the review by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, said: “Most studies were based on the hypothesis that eating organic food is beneficial to health. Looking at all of the studies published in the last 50 years, we have concluded that there’s no good evidence that consumption of organic food is beneficial to health based on the nutrient content.”

He said that while small differences in nutrient content were found between organic and conventionally produced food, they were “unlikely to be of any public health relevance”.

At the same time, the appendix of the FSA report itself shows that some nutrients, such as beta-carotene, are as much as 53% higher in organic food, but such differences are not reflected in its conclusions.

Confusing and contradictory messages about the way we live these days, what we eat, what we drink, where we live, how we spend our leisure time, appear with increasing frequency in the content-hungry media channels of the ‘Information Age.’ The one question provoked by such a study as this is why the Government  should apparently be concerned with discrediting organic food. Whether or not it is of greater nutritional value, few would deny its production is less harmful to the environment, and, although meat production makes absolutely no sense environmentally, animal welfare seems better under an organic farming regime.

True, organic farming is less productive hectare for hectare. In an age of unparalleled population increase this will inevitably need to be factored in. It might, however,  be interesting for any statistician with either time on their hands or independent funding, to examine the relationship between the incidence of gastro-intestinal disorders or food intolerance and diet.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.